Home → Compare → Multilogin alternative

Multilogin alternative

Multilogin is the oldest name in this category and prices like it. Parallel is cheaper per profile at every tier we can compare — but Multilogin bundles things Parallel simply does not have, and for some teams those are worth more than the difference.

Start here: Parallel is Windows only

Parallel ships a Windows build and nothing else. If you work on macOS or Linux, check Multilogin's current platform support first — that settles the question before price enters into it. A Parallel profile can present a macOS fingerprint, but that is the identity it reports to sites, not the computer it runs on.

What each costs

Reading that table honestly

Per profile, Parallel is cheaper everywhere the two line up. Twenty-five profiles for $8 a month is about 32 cents each against roughly $1.10 for Multilogin's ten at $11. At a hundred profiles on annual billing it is $239 against $320. None of that is close enough to argue about.

Two things on their side are real, and neither shows up in a price-per-profile figure.

Bundled proxy traffic. Multilogin includes premium proxy traffic with paid plans, from around a gigabyte a month up to ten on Business. Parallel includes none — you bring your own proxies. If you were going to buy residential traffic anyway, some of their price is buying it for you, and the honest comparison is their plan against our plan plus your proxy bill. Depending on what you use, that can close the gap or reverse it. See residential vs datacenter proxies for what that traffic actually costs.

Unlimited seats on Business. Parallel includes five team members on every paid licence, which is generous next to most of this category — but it is a cap, and Multilogin's Business tier does not have one. A team of fifteen is a plan Parallel does not currently sell.

Their free tier is also larger: five profiles against our three.

What is actually the same

Both give every profile its own cookie jar, storage and fingerprint, and both let you bind a proxy per profile. The fundamentals here are not in dispute, and anyone claiming a dramatic detection advantage over a competitor this established is usually selling something. What differs is coherence, tooling, what is bundled, and price.

If you would rather judge that yourself, run the fingerprint check in both and compare what each profile reports. That is a better test than any comparison table, this one included.

Where Parallel is different

• Price per profile, at every tier. The gap is widest in the middle of the range, where a hundred profiles is $239 a year rather than $320.
• Coherence over hiding. Each profile's OS, screen, GPU, locale and timezone are derived from one seed so they agree with each other, and a bound proxy's geography drives the timezone. See browser fingerprinting explained.
• Automation included, not an add-on. A no-code RPA builder with 58 step types, plus a local CDP endpoint for Puppeteer or Playwright and an MCP server for driving profiles from an AI assistant.
• Licences, not subscriptions. Nothing auto-renews and no card is stored. When a term ends, profiles over the free limit are frozen rather than deleted.

When to stay with Multilogin

• You are not on Windows.
• You want the proxy traffic bundled and would otherwise be buying it separately.
• Your team is larger than five people. Parallel does not sell that plan today.
• You need thousands of profiles. Parallel's largest tier is 500.
• You are already established there. Migration costs time, and a lower price per profile rarely covers rebuilding a working setup.